Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/traps: Only define is_valid_bugaddr() under CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 05:22:33PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> When building with -Wmissing-prototypes without CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG,
> there is a warning about a missing prototype for is_valid_bugaddr():
> 
>   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:46:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'is_valid_bugaddr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>      46 | int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long addr)
>         |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> The prototype is only declared with CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG, so only define
> the function under the same condition to clear up the warning, which
> matches other architectures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
> index 1d2aa448d103..cc3e3a01dfa5 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -43,10 +43,12 @@ static inline void __user *get_trap_ip(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	return (void __user *) (address - (regs->int_code >> 16));
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG
>  int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long addr)
>  {
>  	return 1;
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  void do_report_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int si_signo, int si_code, char *str)
>  {

Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux