[PATCH 2/2] s390/traps: Only define is_valid_bugaddr() under CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When building with -Wmissing-prototypes without CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG,
there is a warning about a missing prototype for is_valid_bugaddr():

  arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:46:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'is_valid_bugaddr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     46 | int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long addr)
        |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The prototype is only declared with CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG, so only define
the function under the same condition to clear up the warning, which
matches other architectures.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
index 1d2aa448d103..cc3e3a01dfa5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
@@ -43,10 +43,12 @@ static inline void __user *get_trap_ip(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return (void __user *) (address - (regs->int_code >> 16));
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG
 int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long addr)
 {
 	return 1;
 }
+#endif
 
 void do_report_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int si_signo, int si_code, char *str)
 {

-- 
2.43.0





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux