Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/traps: Only define is_valid_bugaddr() under CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 05:22:33PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:

Hi Nathan,

> When building with -Wmissing-prototypes without CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG,
> there is a warning about a missing prototype for is_valid_bugaddr():
> 
>   arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:46:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'is_valid_bugaddr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>      46 | int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long addr)
>         |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> The prototype is only declared with CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG, so only define
> the function under the same condition to clear up the warning, which
> matches other architectures.

Thanks for the fix!
The patch is fine, although I have not been able to reproduce the warning. 
How did you trigger it?

> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
...

Thanks!




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux