Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests: livepatch: Test livepatching a heavily called syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:

0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has
style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
       them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script
showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your
output?

I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's
missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset.


Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on
whether or not you would need a module name for this module?

I am not too concerned about MAINTAINERS file warns.

I am assuming you will be sending a new version to address
Joe Lawrence's comments?

thanks,
-- Shuah







[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux