Linux S390: System z9 mainframe
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: simplify the mdev interface v8
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390/qeth: Convert snprintf() to scnprintf()
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/2] s390x: Test specification exceptions during transaction
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/2] s390x: Add specification exception test
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/2] Add specification exception tests
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: simplify the mdev interface v8
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] s390/dasd: use blk_mq_alloc_disk
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: use blk_mq_alloc_disk
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/1] s390/dasd: use blk_mq_alloc_disk
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: simplify the mdev interface v8
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: pci: register pci hooks without interpretation
- From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390/qeth: Convert snprintf() to scnprintf()
- From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations
- From: Fangrui Song <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/qeth: Split memcpy() of struct qeth_ipacmd_addr_change flexible array
- From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: simplify the mdev interface v8
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: simplify the mdev interface v8
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390/qeth: Convert snprintf() to scnprintf()
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390/qeth: Convert snprintf() to scnprintf()
- From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/qeth: Split memcpy() of struct qeth_ipacmd_addr_change flexible array
- From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] s390/ap: Convert to use sysfs_emit() APIs
- From: zhangsongyi.cgel@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: Support SO_REUSEPORT
- From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/44] cpuidle,rcu: Clean up the mess
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 37/44] arm,omap2: Use WFI for omap2_pm_idle()
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][next] s390/dasd: Fix spelling mistake "Ivalid" -> "Invalid"
- From: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/14] vfio/mdev: embedd struct mdev_parent in the parent data structure
- From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/14] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the available_instance sysfs into the core code
- From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/14] vfio/mdev: add mdev available instance checking to the core
- From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/14] vfio/mdev: simplify mdev_type handling
- From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 11/14] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the name sysfs into the core code
- From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/14] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the device_api sysfs into the core code
- From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/14] vfio/mdev: remove mtype_get_parent_dev
- From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/qeth: Split memcpy() of struct qeth_ipacmd_addr_change flexible array
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/qeth: Split memcpy() of struct qeth_ipacmd_addr_change flexible array
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390/qeth: Convert snprintf() to scnprintf()
- From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/7] s390/qeth: Convert snprintf() to scnprintf()
- From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 33/44] ftrace: WARN on rcuidle
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: dasd: use blk_mq_alloc_disk
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] s390/pci: remove unused bus_next field from struct zpci_dev
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 2/2] s390x: Test specification exceptions during transaction
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC net] net/mlx5: Fix performance regression for request-response workloads
- From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] s390/pci: remove unused bus_next field from struct zpci_dev
- From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] s390/pci: remove unused bus_next field from struct zpci_dev
- From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 1/2] s390x: Add specification exception test
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 6.0-rc7
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 6.0-rc7
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/tape: Add __init/__exit annotations to module init/exit funcs
- From: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: Support SO_REUSEPORT
- From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5.15 3/6] kexec: drop weak attribute from functions
- From: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5.15 2/6] kexec_file: drop weak attribute from functions
- From: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5.15 0/6] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature + dependencies
- From: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5.15 1/6] s390/kexec_file: move kernel image size check
- From: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: dasd: use blk_mq_alloc_disk
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: dasd: use blk_mq_alloc_disk
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 0/4] KVM: s390: Fixes for 6.0 take 2
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc()
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH][next] s390/dasd: Fix spelling mistake "Ivalid" -> "Invalid"
- From: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 1/4] KVM: s390: pci: fix plain integer as NULL pointer warnings
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 2/4] KVM: s390: Pass initialized arg even if unused
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 0/4] KVM: s390: Fixes for 6.0 take 2
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 3/4] KVM: s390: pci: fix GAIT physical vs virtual pointers usage
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 4/4] KVM: s390: pci: register pci hooks without interpretation
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/14] vfio/mdev: add mdev available instance checking to the core
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- simplify the mdev interface v8
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/14] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the description sysfs into the core code
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/14] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the name sysfs into the core code
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/14] vfio/mdev: remove mtype_get_parent_dev
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/14] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the available_instance sysfs into the core code
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/14] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the device_api sysfs into the core code
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/14] vfio/mdev: remove mdev_parent_dev
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/14] vfio/mdev: unexport mdev_bus_type
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/14] vfio/mdev: simplify mdev_type handling
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/14] vfio/mdev: remove mdev_from_dev
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/14] vfio/mdev: make mdev.h standalone includable
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/gvt: simplify vgpu configuration management
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/14] vfio/mdev: embedd struct mdev_parent in the parent data structure
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/gvt: fix a memory leak in intel_gvt_init_vgpu_types
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: move -Wundef from KBUILD_CFLAGS to KBUILD_CPPFLAGS
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc()
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] Tidy up vfio_device life cycle
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Stop the CLC flow if no link to map buffers on
- From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] docs/ABI: remove invalid email address from sysfs-bus-css
- From: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next] net/smc: Support SO_REUSEPORT
- From: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] docs/ABI: remove invalid email address from sysfs-bus-css
- From: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc()
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Separate SMC parameter settings from TCP sysctls
- From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Stop the CLC flow if no link to map buffers on
- From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/s390: Get rid of s390_domain_device
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/s390: Fixes related to repeat attach_dev calls
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] s390/pci: remove unused bus_next field from struct zpci_dev
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Stop the CLC flow if no link to map buffers on
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] KVM: s390: Fix double word in comments
- From: Bo Liu <liubo03@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v3 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc()
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/44] cpuidle,psci: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/44] cpuidle,psci: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/cio: remove unused ccw_device_force_console() declaration
- From: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] s390/dasd: add hardware copy relation
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc()
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: pci: register pci hooks without interpretation
- From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] s390/dasd: add hardware copy relation
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/tlbbatch: Introduce arch_tlbbatch_should_defer()
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/tlbbatch: Introduce arch_tlbbatch_should_defer()
- From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 0/2] mm: arm64: bring up BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH
- From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] make weak attributes in {k,u}probes
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] s390/dasd: add hardware copy relation
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc()
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] s390/dasd: add hardware copy relation
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 09/15] vfio/ap: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 08/15] drm/i915/gvt: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 14/15] vfio: Rename vfio_device_put() and vfio_device_try_get()
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 13/15] vfio/ccw: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 05/15] vfio/mdpy: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 07/15] vfio/mbochs: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 12/15] vfio/amba: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 06/15] vfio/mtty: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 10/15] vfio/fsl-mc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 04/15] vfio/hisi_acc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 11/15] vfio/platform: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 03/15] vfio/mlx5: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 02/15] vfio/pci: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 00/15] Tidy up vfio_device life cycle
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v3 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v3 06/15] vfio/mtty: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] KVM: s390: pci: register pci hooks without interpretation
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] KVM: s390: pci: register pci hooks without interpretation
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: dasd: use blk_mq_alloc_disk
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] KVM: s390: pci: register pci hooks without interpretation
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/7] s390/dasd: put block allocation in separate function
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/7] s390/dasd: add copy pair setup
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/7] s390/dasd: add copy pair swap capability
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/7] s390/dasd: add device ping attribute
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/7] s390/dasd: suppress generic error messages for PPRC secondary devices
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/7] s390/dasd: add ioctl to perform a swap of the drivers copy pair
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/7] s390/dasd: add query PPRC function
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/7] s390/dasd: add hardware copy relation
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/15] vfio/mtty: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] make weak attributes in {k,u}probes
- From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc()
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/44] cpuidle,rcu: Clean up the mess
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Separate SMC parameter settings from TCP sysctls
- From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/44] cpuidle,rcu: Clean up the mess
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/44] cpuidle,omap4: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/44] cpuidle/poll: Ensure IRQ state is invariant
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net/smc: Unbind r/w buffer size from clcsock and make them tunable
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net/smc: Introduce a specific sysctl for TEST_LINK time
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Separate SMC parameter settings from TCP sysctls
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: Introduce a specific sysctl for TEST_LINK time
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/44] cpuidle,imx6: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/44] cpuidle,imx6: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/44] cpuidle/poll: Ensure IRQ state is invariant
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/44] cpuidle,omap3: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: pci: fix GAIT physical vs virtual pointers usage
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: Introduce a specific sysctl for TEST_LINK time
- From: "dust.li" <dust.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 00/11] s390x: LPAR boot fix and additional tests
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 03/11] s390x: smp: add tests for calls in wait state
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 01/11] s390x: smp: move sigp calls with invalid cpu address to array
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 11/11] s390x: create persistent comm-key
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 08/11] s390x: add pgm spec interrupt loop test
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 10/11] s390x: factor out common args for genprotimg
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 09/11] s390x: Add strict mode to specification exception interpretation test
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 07/11] s390x: add extint loop test
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 06/11] lib/s390x: add CPU timer related defines and functions
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 04/11] lib/s390x: fix SMP setup bug
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 05/11] runtime: add support for panic tests
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 02/11] s390x: smp: use an array for sigp calls
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: dasd: use blk_mq_alloc_disk
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH net] net/smc: Stop the CLC flow if no link to map buffers on
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: Introduce a specific sysctl for TEST_LINK time
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 21/44] arch/idle: Change arch_cpu_idle() IRQ behaviour
- From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: Introduce a specific sysctl for TEST_LINK time
- From: "dust.li" <dust.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: Introduce a specific sysctl for TEST_LINK time
- From: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/smc: Unbind r/w buffer size from clcsock and make them tunable
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: Introduce a specific sysctl for TEST_LINK time
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 25/44] printk: Remove trace_.*_rcuidle() usage
- From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 0/2] Separate SMC parameter settings from TCP sysctls
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] s390/dasd fix oops
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: Pass initialized arg even if unused
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: fix Oops in dasd_alias_get_start_dev due to missing pavgroup
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/1] s390/dasd fix oops
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/44] cpuidle,rcu: Clean up the mess
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/44] cpuidle,omap3: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/44] cpuidle,imx6: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/44] cpuidle,imx6: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/44] cpuidle,imx6: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/44] cpuidle,imx6: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/44] cpuidle,imx6: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/44] cpuidle,omap3: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/44] cpuidle,armada: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/44] cpuidle,omap3: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/44] cpuidle,imx6: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/44] cpuidle,psci: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/44] cpuidle,tegra: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/44] cpuidle,riscv: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/44] cpuidle/poll: Ensure IRQ state is invariant
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/44] cpuidle,riscv: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 30/44] cpuidle,xenpv: Make more PARAVIRT_XXL noinstr clean
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/44] cpuidle,imx6: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/44] cpuidle,tegra: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 36/44] cpuidle,omap4: Push RCU-idle into omap4_enter_lowpower()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 37/44] arm,omap2: Use WFI for omap2_pm_idle()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 18/44] cpuidle,intel_idle: Fix CPUIDLE_FLAG_IRQ_ENABLE *again*
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 40/44] ubsan: Fix objtool UACCESS warns
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 21/44] arch/idle: Change arch_cpu_idle() IRQ behaviour
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 28/44] cpuidle,mwait: Make noinstr clean
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 25/44] printk: Remove trace_.*_rcuidle() usage
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 44/44] arm64,riscv,perf: Remove RCU_NONIDLE() usage
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 31/44] cpuidle,nospec: Make noinstr clean
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 39/44] cpuidle,clk: Remove trace_.*_rcuidle()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 42/44] entry,kasan,x86: Disallow overriding mem*() functions
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 35/44] cpuidle,omap3: Push RCU-idle into omap_sram_idle()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 38/44] cpuidle,powerdomain: Remove trace_.*_rcuidle()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 27/44] cpuidle,sched: Remove annotations from TIF_{POLLING_NRFLAG,NEED_RESCHED}
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/44] cpuidle,armada: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 23/44] arm,smp: Remove trace_.*_rcuidle() usage
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/44] cpuidle,psci: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 20/44] cpuidle,intel_idle: Fix CPUIDLE_FLAG_IBRS
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/44] cpuidle,rcu: Clean up the mess
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 32/44] cpuidle,acpi: Make noinstr clean
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/44] x86/perf/amd: Remove tracing from perf_lopwr_cb()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 41/44] intel_idle: Add force_irq_on module param
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 29/44] cpuidle,tdx: Make tdx noinstr clean
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/44] cpuidle,dt: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 33/44] ftrace: WARN on rcuidle
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 22/44] x86/tdx: Remove TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 30/44] cpuidle,xenpv: Make more PARAVIRT_XXL noinstr clean
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 16/44] cpuidle: Annotate poll_idle()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 34/44] cpuidle,omap3: Use WFI for omap3_pm_idle()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 43/44] sched: Always inline __this_cpu_preempt_check()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 17/44] objtool/idle: Validate __cpuidle code as noinstr
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 15/44] acpi_idle: Remove tracing
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/44] cpuidle/poll: Ensure IRQ state is invariant
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 19/44] cpuidle,intel_idle: Fix CPUIDLE_FLAG_INIT_XSTATE
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 26/44] time/tick-broadcast: Remove RCU_NONIDLE usage
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 24/44] arm64,smp: Remove trace_.*_rcuidle() usage
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/44] x86/idle: Replace x86_idle with a static_call
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/44] cpuidle: Move IRQ state validation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/44] cpuidle,omap3: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 14/44] cpuidle,cpu_pm: Remove RCU fiddling from cpu_pm_{enter,exit}()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/44] cpuidle,riscv: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 13/44] cpuidle: Fix ct_idle_*() usage
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/44] cpuidle,omap4: Push RCU-idle into driver
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [v1] KVM: s390: pv: fix external interruption loop not always detected
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] KVM: s390: pci: fix comparing pointer to 0
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] KVM: s390: pci: fix comparing pointer to 0
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] make weak attributes in {k,u}probes
- From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] uprobes: make arch_uprobe_exception_notify as weak
- From: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] make weak attributes in {k,u}probes
- From: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] kprobes: make arch_init_kprobes as weak
- From: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION d5538ab91d3a9a237805be6f8c6c272af2987995
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
- From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: pci: fix plain integer as NULL pointer warnings
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/10] net/smc: fix application data exception
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
- From: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
- From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION 6ce5d01e7011b32600656bf90a626b1e51fb192a
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: pci: fix plain integer as NULL pointer warnings
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: pci: fix plain integer as NULL pointer warnings
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: pci: fix plain integer as NULL pointer warnings
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] iommu/s390: Get rid of s390_domain_device
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] iommu/s390: Fixes related to repeat attach_dev calls
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] s390/pci: remove unused bus_next field from struct zpci_dev
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: bypass unnecessary processing of AP resources
- From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: bypass unnecessary processing of AP resources
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [patch 21/32] NTB/msi: Convert to msi_on_each_desc()
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- [s390:features 12/14] arch/s390/mm/maccess.c:85:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'memcpy_real_init'
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: bypass unnecessary processing of AP resources
- From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/cio: remove unused ccw_device_force_console() declaration
- From: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Illegal operation with clang + CONFIG_MARCH_Z13
- From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Illegal operation with clang + CONFIG_MARCH_Z13
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Illegal operation with clang + CONFIG_MARCH_Z13
- From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Illegal operation with clang + CONFIG_MARCH_Z13
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Illegal operation with clang + CONFIG_MARCH_Z13
- From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: fix unlinking of queues from the mdev
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: fix unlinking of queues from the mdev
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: fix unlinking of queues from the mdev
- From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: fix two problems discovered in the vfio_ap driver
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH kernel] KVM: PPC: Make KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE platform dependent
- From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] kbuild: move -Wundef from KBUILD_CFLAGS to KBUILD_CPPFLAGS
- From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: vsie: fix crycb virtual vs physical usage
- From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 6.0-rc5
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 6.0-rc5
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations
- From: Fangrui Song <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Who cares about Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-css?
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: pci: fix GAIT physical vs virtual pointers usage
- From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] kcsan: Instrument memcpy/memset/memmove with newer Clang
- From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v3 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] objtool, kcsan: Add volatile read/write instrumentation to whitelist
- From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] kcsan: Instrument memcpy/memset/memmove with newer Clang
- From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] s390: Always declare __mem functions
- From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] kcsan: Instrument memcpy/memset/memmove with newer Clang
- From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] s390: Always declare __mem functions
- From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/3] objtool, kcsan: Add volatile read/write instrumentation to whitelist
- From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections
- From: Jan Karcher <jaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: rmap: Extend tlbbatch APIs to fit new platforms
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: rmap: Extend tlbbatch APIs to fit new platforms
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] Revert "Documentation/features: mark BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH doesn't apply to ARM64"
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] Revert "Documentation/features: mark BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH doesn't apply to ARM64"
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/tlbbatch: Introduce arch_tlbbatch_should_defer()
- From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 13/15] vfio/ccw: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 12/15] vfio/amba: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 14/15] vfio: Rename vfio_device_put() and vfio_device_try_get()
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 04/15] vfio/hisi_acc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 11/15] vfio/platform: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 10/15] vfio/fsl-mc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 09/15] vfio/ap: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 08/15] drm/i915/gvt: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 05/15] vfio/mdpy: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 07/15] vfio/mbochs: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 02/15] vfio/pci: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 06/15] vfio/mtty: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 00/15] Tidy up vfio_device life cycle
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 03/15] vfio/mlx5: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 13/15] vfio/ccw: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 13/15] vfio/ccw: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC net] tcp: Fix performance regression for request-response workloads
- From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC net] tcp: Fix performance regression for request-response workloads
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/10] net/smc: fix application data exception
- From: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 13/15] vfio/ccw: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.0-rc4
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] vfio: Rename vfio_device_put() and vfio_device_try_get()
- From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] vfio/amba: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/15] vfio/platform: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: fix two problems discovered in the vfio_ap driver
- From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC net] tcp: Fix performance regression for request-response workloads
- From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] KVM: s390: pci: fix GAIT physical vs virtual pointers usage
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v5] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC net] tcp: Fix performance regression for request-response workloads
- From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
- From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending
- From: Jan Karcher <jaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] drm/i915/gvt: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: fix two problems discovered in the vfio_ap driver
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.0-rc4
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: fix two problems discovered in the vfio_ap driver
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: handle truncate racing with page faults
- From: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net v5] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: arm64: bring up BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH
- From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
- From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: vsie: fix crycb virtual vs physical usage
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] KVM: s390: vsie: fix crycb virtual vs physical usage
- From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.0-rc4
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 2/2] s390x: Test specification exceptions during transaction
- From: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
- From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 6.0-rc4
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 6.0-rc4
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Remove private items from linux/vfio_pci_core.h
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: VFIO PCI build fix
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 2/2] s390x: Test specification exceptions during transaction
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 2/2] s390x: Test specification exceptions during transaction
- From: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
- From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: Remove redundant refcount increase
- From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 12/15] vfio/amba: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 14/15] vfio: Rename vfio_device_put() and vfio_device_try_get()
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/15] vfio/platform: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/15] vfio/amba: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/15] vfio/fsl-mc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 13/15] vfio/ccw: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/15] vfio/ap: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/15] drm/i915/gvt: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/15] vfio/mbochs: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/15] vfio/mtty: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/15] vfio/pci: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/15] vfio/hisi_acc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/15] vfio/mlx5: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/15] vfio/mdpy: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/15] Tidy up vfio_device life cycle
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: Remove redundant refcount increase
- From: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Remove redundant refcount increase
- From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 2/2] iommu/s390: fix leak of s390_domain_device
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 0/2] iommu/s390: fixes related to repeat attach_dev calls
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] fs/xattr: wire up syscalls
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: fix listen processing for SMC-Rv2
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: fix listen processing for SMC-Rv2
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH net v4] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: Pass initialized arg even if unused
- From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending
- From: Jan Karcher <jaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] s390: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP
- From: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] s390: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP
- From: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] s390: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP
- From: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 04/15] vfio/hisi_acc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/cpumf: fix repeated words in comments
- From: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/delay: fix repeated words in comments
- From: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] KVM: s390: fix repeated words in comments
- From: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 00/15] Tidy up vfio_device life cycle
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 10/15] vfio/fsl-mc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/15] Tidy up vfio_device life cycle
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 10/15] vfio/fsl-mc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations
- From: Fangrui Song <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: buffer overflow in vfio_ccw_async_region_write/vfio_ccw_async_region_read
- From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] fs/xattr: wire up syscalls
- From: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] fs/xattr: wire up syscalls
- From: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net v2] net/smc: Remove redundant refcount increase
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 1/2] s390x: Add specification exception test
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 1/2] s390x: Add specification exception test
- From: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: fix listen processing for SMC-Rv2
- From: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/15] vfio/ap: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net v3] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [GIT PULL 1/1] KVM: s390: pci: Hook to access KVM lowlevel from VFIO
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: VFIO PCI build fix
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: fix listen processing for SMC-Rv2
- From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: fix listen processing for SMC-Rv2
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH net v2] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: start to validate reserved header bytes
- From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Remove redundant refcount increase
- From: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net] net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH net] net/smc: Remove redundant refcount increase
- From: liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending
- From: Jan Karcher <jaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] s390/vfio-ap: fix two problems discovered in the vfio_ap driver
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: start to validate reserved header bytes
- From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] vfio/pci: Simplify the is_intx/msi/msix/etc defines
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] vfio/pci: Rename vfio_pci_register_dev_region()
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] vfio/pci: Split linux/vfio_pci_core.h
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/appldata: Do not initialise statics to 0
- From: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections
- From: Tony Lu <tonylu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] vfio/pci: Rename vfio_pci_register_dev_region()
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] s390: Fix nospec table alignments
- From: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 6.0-rc3
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH RFC] s390: Fix nospec table alignments
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 00/15] Tidy up vfio_device life cycle
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] s390: Fix nospec table alignments
- From: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/appldata: Do not initialise statics to 0
- From: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390: Remove the initialization of statics to 0
- From: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390/sthyi: Fix comments typo
- From: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 13/15] vfio/ccw: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [RFC PATCH] vfio/ccw: Move mdev stuff out of struct subchannel
- From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 6.0-rc3
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/15] vfio/hisi_acc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/15] vfio/mdpy: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/15] vfio/amba: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/15] vfio/ap: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/15] vfio/mlx5: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/15] vfio/platform: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/15] vfio/mbochs: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/15] vfio/ccw: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/15] vfio/mtty: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/15] vfio/fsl-mc: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/15] vfio: Rename vfio_device_put() and vfio_device_try_get()
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915/gvt: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/15] vfio/pci: Use the new device life cycle helpers
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying vfio_device life cycle
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/15] Tidy up vfio_device life cycle
- From: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections
- From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC] s390: Fix nospec table alignments
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] vfio/pci: Split linux/vfio_pci_core.h
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3] Remove private items from linux/vfio_pci_core.h
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/3] vfio/pci: Simplify the is_intx/msi/msix/etc defines
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] vfio/pci: Rename vfio_pci_register_dev_region()
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfio/pci: Split linux/vfio_pci_core.h
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] sparc: use the asm-generic version of cpuinfo_op
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 0/2] Add specification exception tests
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 1/2] s390x: Add specification exception test
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 2/2] s390x: Test specification exceptions during transaction
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] sparc: use the asm-generic version of cpuinfo_op
- From: <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] sparc: use the asm-generic version of cpuinfo_op
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/2] s390x: Add specification exception test
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/2] s390x: Add specification exception test
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] s390: Fix repeated word in comments
- From: Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 06/10] net/smc: use read semaphores to reduce unnecessary blocking in smc_buf_create() & smcr_buf_unuse()
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 10/10] net/smc: fix application data exception
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 08/10] net/smc: replace mutex rmbs_lock and sndbufs_lock with rw_semaphore
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 09/10] net/smc: Fix potential panic dues to unprotected smc_llc_srv_add_link()
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 05/10] net/smc: llc_conf_mutex refactor, replace it with rw_semaphore
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 07/10] net/smc: reduce unnecessary blocking in smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs()
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 02/10] net/smc: fix SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB without smc_server_lgr_pending
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 04/10] net/smc: make SMC_LLC_FLOW_RKEY run concurrently
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 03/10] net/smc: allow confirm/delete rkey response deliver multiplex
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections
- From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390/cpum_sf.c: Fix comment typo
- From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] include/linux: declare cpuinfo_op in processor.h
- From: Conor Dooley <mail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Pass initialized arg even if unused
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: Pass initialized arg even if unused
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: start to validate reserved header bytes
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4] s390x: Add strict mode to specification exception interpretation test
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
- [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4] s390x: Add strict mode to specification exception interpretation test
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add strict mode to specification exception interpretation test
- From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Pass initialized arg even if unused
- From: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 1/2] s390x: Add specification exception test
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add strict mode to specification exception interpretation test
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 2/4] s390/hypfs: avoid error message under KVM
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/5] s390/hypfs: avoid error message under KVM
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 1/3] s390/hypfs: avoid error message under KVM
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 4/8] s390/hypfs: avoid error message under KVM
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 05/11] s390/hypfs: avoid error message under KVM
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 09/20] s390/hypfs: avoid error message under KVM
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 19/38] s390/hypfs: avoid error message under KVM
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next] genetlink: start to validate reserved header bytes
- From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] iommu/s390: Fix race with release_device ops
- From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] KVM: s390: Pass initialized arg even if unused
- From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/14] vfio/mdev: simplify mdev_type handling
- From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [v1] KVM: s390: pv: fix external interruption loop not always detected
- From: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] s390: kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1529!
- From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] s390: kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1529!
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] s390: kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1529!
- From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] s390: fix double free of GS and RI CBs on fork() failure
- From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
- From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: rmap: Extend tlbbatch APIs to fit new platforms
- From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/tlbbatch: Introduce arch_tlbbatch_should_defer()
- From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Bugtraq]