Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: interrupt: fix virtual-physical confusion for next alert GISA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 23.02.23 17:22, Nico Boehr wrote:
We sometimes put a virtual address in next_alert, which should always be
a physical address, since it is shared with hardware.

This currently works, because virtual and physical addresses are
the same.

Add phys_to_virt() to resolve the virtual-physical confusion.

Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index ab26aa53ee37..20743c5b000a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static inline u8 gisa_get_ipm_or_restore_iam(struct kvm_s390_gisa_interrupt *gi)
static inline int gisa_in_alert_list(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa)
  {
-	return READ_ONCE(gisa->next_alert) != (u32)(u64)gisa;
+	return READ_ONCE(gisa->next_alert) != (u32)virt_to_phys(gisa);
  }
static inline void gisa_set_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
@@ -3167,7 +3167,7 @@ void kvm_s390_gisa_init(struct kvm *kvm)
  	hrtimer_init(&gi->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
  	gi->timer.function = gisa_vcpu_kicker;
  	memset(gi->origin, 0, sizeof(struct kvm_s390_gisa));
-	gi->origin->next_alert = (u32)(u64)gi->origin;
+	gi->origin->next_alert = (u32)virt_to_phys(gi->origin);
  	VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "gisa 0x%pK initialized", gi->origin);
  }

Here is my

Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I ran hades tests as well. Thanks.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux