Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] s390: nmi: fix virtual-physical address confusion

To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] s390: nmi: fix virtual-physical address confusion
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:17:09 +0100
Cc: borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Y+35mHYZJlKT+e+s@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com>
References: <20230215160252.14672-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com> <20230215160252.14672-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com> <Y+3KYSnJsznJEX4v@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com> <Y+35mHYZJlKT+e+s@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2

On 2/16/23 10:38, Alexander Gordeev wrote:

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:17:07AM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:

Casting to (struct kvm_s390_sie_block *) is not superfluous,


s/not//


Do you want to pick this up or should it go through the kvm tree?

References:
- [PATCH v1 0/1] s390: nmi: fix virtual-physical address confusion
  - From: Nico Boehr
- [PATCH v1 1/1] s390: nmi: fix virtual-physical address confusion
  - From: Nico Boehr
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] s390: nmi: fix virtual-physical address confusion
  - From: Alexander Gordeev
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] s390: nmi: fix virtual-physical address confusion
  - From: Alexander Gordeev