RE: hackbench score comparison between 5.10.75-rt47 and 5.14.14-rt21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior' <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 6:43 PM
> To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rt-
> users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: hackbench score comparison between 5.10.75-rt47 and 5.14.14-
> rt21
> 
> On 2021-11-16 10:37:22 [+0100], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 11/12/21 15:00, 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior' wrote:
> > > On 2021-11-05 10:41:40 [+0900], Chanho Park wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >> I checked the same test on my aarch64 target. I'll do more
> > >> realistic benchmark such as compile bench.
> > >>
> > >> <5.10.73-rt54 aarch64>
> > >> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000
> > >> Time: 24.994
> > >>
> > >> <5.15.0-rt17 aarch64 w/o CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL>
> > >> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000
> > >> Time: 31.372
> > >>
> > >> <5.15.0-rt17 aarch64 w/ CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL>
> > >> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000
> > >> Time: 35.269
> > >
> > > The last two are equal, is that on purporse?
> >
> > I see the first of last two is without SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL and the second
> > with SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL, so not equal?
> 
> indeed. I didn't notice the missing o. Thanks!.

Sorry for this confusion.

> 
> > > Any feedback on v5.14-rc3-rt1 and v5.14-rc3-rt2? v5.13-rt1 should be
> > > identical to you 5.10 numbers.

I got below value on v5.14-rc3-rt1.

<5.14.0-rc3-rt1 aarch64>
Time: 35.948

Unfortunately, I've got below panic on v5.13-rt1. I stacked same patches for my board both v5.13-rt1 and v514-rc3-rt1.

[    0.112294] Freeing unused kernel memory: 5440K
[    0.131064] Run /sbin/init as init process
[    0.137371] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.137373] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1 at arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c:286 task_fpsimd_load+0x98/0xc0
[    0.137381] Modules linked in:
[    0.137385] CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.13.0-rt1-00032-gdee4765ed8ff #317
[    0.137388] Hardware name: Samsung ExynosAuto v9 SADK board (DT)
[    0.137389] pstate: 40400009 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
[    0.137392] pc : task_fpsimd_load+0x98/0xc0
[    0.137394] lr : task_fpsimd_load+0x18/0xc0
[    0.137396] sp : ffff80001004bd60
[    0.137397] x29: ffff80001004bd60 x28: ffff000800098000 x27: 0000000000000000
[    0.137400] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000045585401
[    0.137402] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff0008000986d8 x21: ffff000800098000
[    0.137405] x20: ffff80001004beb0 x19: 0000000000000008 x18: 0000000000000014
[    0.137408] x17: 00000000ccf04c01 x16: 0000000027fe4405 x15: 00000000083da15a
[    0.137411] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000ffffd305cbf8 x12: 000000000000000f
[    0.137414] x11: 0000ffffd305cfed x10: 000000000000001f x9 : 0000000000000000
[    0.137416] x8 : ffff80001004c000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000001
[    0.137418] x5 : 0000000080080007 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001
[    0.137421] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000
[    0.137424] Call trace:
[    0.137425]  task_fpsimd_load+0x98/0xc0
[    0.137427]  fpsimd_restore_current_state+0x78/0xac
[    0.137430]  do_notify_resume+0x10c/0x1300
[    0.137434]  work_pending+0xc/0x5f8
[    0.137436] ---[ end trace 0000000000000002 ]---

Best Regards,
Chanho Park





[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux