On 2021-11-16 10:37:22 [+0100], Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 11/12/21 15:00, 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior' wrote: > > On 2021-11-05 10:41:40 [+0900], Chanho Park wrote: > >> Hi, > > Hi, > > > >> I checked the same test on my aarch64 target. I'll do more realistic > >> benchmark such as compile bench. > >> > >> <5.10.73-rt54 aarch64> > >> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000 > >> Time: 24.994 > >> > >> <5.15.0-rt17 aarch64 w/o CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL> > >> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000 > >> Time: 31.372 > >> > >> <5.15.0-rt17 aarch64 w/ CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL> > >> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000 > >> Time: 35.269 > > > > The last two are equal, is that on purporse? > > I see the first of last two is without SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL and the second with > SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL, so not equal? indeed. I didn't notice the missing o. Thanks!. > > Any feedback on v5.14-rc3-rt1 and v5.14-rc3-rt2? v5.13-rt1 should be > > identical to you 5.10 numbers. > > > >> Best Regards, > >> Chanho Park Sebastian
