Re: hackbench score comparison between 5.10.75-rt47 and 5.14.14-rt21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-11-05 10:41:40 [+0900], Chanho Park wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,

> I checked the same test on my aarch64 target. I'll do more realistic
> benchmark such as compile bench.
> 
> <5.10.73-rt54 aarch64>
> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000
> Time: 24.994
> 
> <5.15.0-rt17 aarch64 w/o CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL>
> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000
> Time: 31.372
> 
> <5.15.0-rt17 aarch64 w/ CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL>
> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000
> Time: 35.269

The last two are equal, is that on purporse?
Any feedback on v5.14-rc3-rt1 and v5.14-rc3-rt2? v5.13-rt1 should be
identical to you 5.10 numbers.

> Best Regards,
> Chanho Park

Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux