On 11/12/21 15:00, 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior' wrote: > On 2021-11-05 10:41:40 [+0900], Chanho Park wrote: >> Hi, > Hi, > >> I checked the same test on my aarch64 target. I'll do more realistic >> benchmark such as compile bench. >> >> <5.10.73-rt54 aarch64> >> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000 >> Time: 24.994 >> >> <5.15.0-rt17 aarch64 w/o CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL> >> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000 >> Time: 31.372 >> >> <5.15.0-rt17 aarch64 w/ CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL> >> root@euto-v9-sadk:~# hackbench -l 10000 >> Time: 35.269 > > The last two are equal, is that on purporse? I see the first of last two is without SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL and the second with SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL, so not equal? > Any feedback on v5.14-rc3-rt1 and v5.14-rc3-rt2? v5.13-rt1 should be > identical to you 5.10 numbers. > >> Best Regards, >> Chanho Park > > Sebastian >
