Re: WAS: linux-rt fails to boot on > 3.12.5.-rt7 ... NOW IS: linux-rt-3.14 boots by reverting patches + nvidia uses __rt_mutex_init [which in 3.14 has been changed to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Kimmo,

>> you can get the patch here; http://pastebin.com/VG7X5WjK ... it
>> applies over 3.14.3-rt5 [after you've already applied the -rt patch,
>> you apply it]. It's yielded working AMD Phenom systems for me
>> [although, i don't have the exact same H/W as you]. it might be worth
>> a try, just to see if it works.
>
> I can confirm that applying the patch in http://pastebin.com/VG7X5WjK to
> 3.14.3-rt5 makes my system bootable even with AMD C1E enabled.
> To clarify my previous email, those other tricks "processor.max_cstate=0",
> "processor.nocst", etc... did not help.

Well, it looks like you are another person who's system is unstable
when those 3 upstream -rt patches are applied. Reverting [as you have
done now] should result in a usable/stable system for you [its worked
for myself and others for a few releases now. Maybe you can post back
on how that goes for you?]. Although, depending on config; ie: if you
are using no_hz_idle/full you may see "NOHZ: softirq pending 40"
[which one of the patches we reverted fixes, IIRC]. Myself, I don't
use NO_HZ_* and use the 'periodic timers' in the kernel, instead.

anyway, I am not sure how to fix this, beyond reverting / using that
patch. I know that some of the devs have had a hard time reproducing
the problem - maybe Paul will have better luck on another AMD system
[here is hoping]. But at least for now, you should be able to use that
patch.

jordan

> Kimmo
>>
>>
>>> OK, so I never got back to finding a system that could reproduce this,
>>> but it sounds like it is still worthwhile; thanks for the reminder and
>>> I'll go see if I can reproduce this on a quad since the six core was OK.
>>
>> Hey Paul, I also forgot to get back to you ;) ... I had been carrying
>> over my .config - so i tried using defconfig too [just to see] and it
>> was no different. I was astonished that yours booted up just fine,
>> because i know of other AMD users [aside from Kimmo] who can't boot on
>> vainlla-rt... Again, 3.14.x-rtX boot and work just fine for me, by
>> reverting those patches. I had thought maybe -rt5 would boot [it
>> looked to have some substantial changes], but alas -rt5 also required
>> the patch for a working system.
>>
>> Jordan
>>
>>> P.
>>> --
>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Kimmo
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>>>> linux-rt-users" in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux