Hi Wolfram, On 21.4.2018 18:23, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Michal, > > Thanks for the reviews! > >> There are two more occurences in this gpio-zynq driver. >> zynq_gpio_resume, zynq_gpio_suspend. It wasn't detected because these >> two lines are not together. But the same change can be applied for them too. > > Not really. The rule would have matched if there was just "something" > inbetween. It did not match because the "something" involves the > variable 'pdev', so we can't remove it. And just changing towards > 'dev_get_drvdata' and keeping 'pdev' was not worth the hazzle in my > book. Especially since I think the code should probably get refactored. > Calling platform_get_irq() in suspend/resume paths in order to get the > irq_data looks a little expensive to me, but I haven't tested it. > ok. Thanks. I have overlooked that. Thanks, Michal
