Hi Michal, Thanks for the reviews! > There are two more occurences in this gpio-zynq driver. > zynq_gpio_resume, zynq_gpio_suspend. It wasn't detected because these > two lines are not together. But the same change can be applied for them too. Not really. The rule would have matched if there was just "something" inbetween. It did not match because the "something" involves the variable 'pdev', so we can't remove it. And just changing towards 'dev_get_drvdata' and keeping 'pdev' was not worth the hazzle in my book. Especially since I think the code should probably get refactored. Calling platform_get_irq() in suspend/resume paths in order to get the irq_data looks a little expensive to me, but I haven't tested it. Best wishes, Wolfram PS: Please quote only relevant parts of the message, it is a lot easier to find comments then IMO.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
