Hi Chris,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/1/2016, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>
>> On 12/01/2016 05:42 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>
>> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
>> >> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static struct sh_eth_cpu_data r7s72100_data = {
>> >>
>> >> .ecsr_value = ECSR_ICD,
>> >> .ecsipr_value = ECSIPR_ICDIP,
>> >> - .eesipr_value = 0xff7f009f,
>> >> + .eesipr_value = 0xe77f009f,
>> >
>> > Comment not directly related to the merits of this patch: the EESIPR
>> > bit definitions seem to be identical to those for EESR, so we can get
>> > rid of the hardcoded values here?
>>
>> Do you mean using the @define's? We have EESIPR bits also declared,
>> see enum DMAC_IM_BIT,
Yes, that's what I meant.
Unfortunately the DMAC_IM_BIT enum doesn't cover all bits.
> Is your idea to get rid of .eesipr_value for devices that have values
> that are the same as .eesr_err_check?
>
>
> For example in sh_eth_dev_init():
>
> sh_eth_modify(ndev, EESR, 0, 0);
> mdp->irq_enabled = true;
> - sh_eth_write(ndev, mdp->cd->eesipr_value, EESIPR);
> + if (mdp->cd->eesipr_value)
> + sh_eth_write(ndev, mdp->cd->eesipr_value, EESIPR);
> + else
> + sh_eth_write(ndev, mdp->cd->eesr_err_check, EESIPR);
No, my intention was to just get rid of the hardcoded values when
initializing .eesipr_value.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
