On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 04:20:40PM +0800, Ka-Cheong Poon wrote: > On 10/9/20 11:34 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > Yes, because namespaces are fundamentally supposed to be anchored in > > the processes inside the namespace. > > > > Having the kernel jump in and start opening holes as soon as a > > namespace is created is just wrong. > > > > At a bare minimum the listener should not exist until something in the > > namespace is willing to work with RDS. > > > As I mentioned in a previous email, starting is not the problem. It > is the problem of deleting a namespace. Starting and ending are symmetric. When the last thing inside the namespace stops needing RDS then RDS should close down the cm_id's. Jason
