Hey all, > > Hi Potnuri & Co, > > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 23:23 +0530, Potnuri Bharat Teja wrote: > > Hi Nicholas, > > thanks for the suggestions. Comments below. > > > > On Thursday, January 01/18/18, 2018 at 15:28:42 +0530, Nicholas A. Bellinger > wrote: > > > Hi Shiraz, Michal & Co, > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback. Comments below. > > > > > > On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 09:22 -0600, Shiraz Saleem wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 03:12:36AM -0700, Kalderon, Michal wrote: > > > > > > From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma- > > > > > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nicholas A. Bellinger > > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 6:57 AM > > > > > > To: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Cc: Amrani, Ram <Ram.Amrani@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sagi Grimberg > > > > > > <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Elior, Ariel > > > > > > <Ariel.Elior@xxxxxxxxxx>; target-devel <target- > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > > > > > > Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Subject: Re: SQ overflow seen running isert traffic with high block sizes > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Shiraz, Ram, Ariel, & Potnuri, > > > > > > > > > > > > Following up on this old thread, as it relates to Potnuri's recent fix for a > iser- > > > > > > target queue-full memory leak: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg16282.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Just curious how frequent this happens in practice with sustained large > block > > > > > > workloads, as it appears to effect at least three different iwarp RNICS > (i40iw, > > > > > > qedr and iw_cxgb4)..? > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anything else from an iser-target consumer level that should be > > > > > > changed for iwarp to avoid repeated ib_post_send() failures..? > > > > > > > > > > > Would like to mention, that although we are an iWARP RNIC as well, > we've hit this > > > > > Issue when running RoCE. It's not iWARP related. > > > > > This is easily reproduced within seconds with IO size of 5121K > > > > > Using 5 Targets with 2 Ram Disk each and 5 targets with FileIO Disks > each. > > > > > > > > > > IO Command used: > > > > > maim -b512k -T32 -t2 -Q8 -M0 -o -u -n -m17 -ftargets.dat -d1 > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > Michal > > > > > > > > Its seen with block size >= 2M on a single target 1 RAM disk config. And > similar to Michals report; > > > > rather quickly, in a matter of seconds. > > > > > > > > fio --rw=read --bs=2048k --numjobs=1 --iodepth=128 --runtime=30 -- > size=20g --loops=1 --ioengine=libaio > > > > --direct=1 --invalidate=1 --fsync_on_close=1 --norandommap --exitall -- > filename=/dev/sdb --name=sdb > > > > > > > > > > A couple of thoughts. > > > > > > First, would it be helpful to limit maximum payload size per I/O for > > > consumers based on number of iser-target sq hw sges..? > > yes, I think HW num sge needs to be propagated to iscsi target. > > > > > > That is, if rdma_rw_ctx_post() -> ib_post_send() failures are related to > > > maximum payload size per I/O being too large there is an existing > > > > Yes they are IO size specific, I observed SQ overflow with fio for IO sizes above > > 256k and for READ tests only with chelsio(iw_cxgb4) adapters. > > Thanks for confirming. > > > > target_core_fabric_ops mechanism for limiting using SCSI residuals, > > > originally utilized by qla2xxx here: > > > > > > target/qla2xxx: Honor max_data_sg_nents I/O transfer limit > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8 > f9b565482c537821588444e09ff732c7d65ed6e > > > > > > Note this patch also will return a smaller Block Limits VPD (0x86) > > > MAXIMUM TRANSFER LENGTH based on max_data_sg_nents * PAGE_SIZE, > which > > > means for modern SCSI initiators honoring MAXIMUM TRANSFER LENGTH > will > > > automatically limit maximum outgoing payload transfer length, and avoid > > > SCSI residual logic. > > > > > > As-is, iser-target doesn't a propagate max_data_sg_ents limit into > > > iscsi-target, but you can try testing with a smaller value to see if > > > it's useful. Eg: > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_configfs.c > b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_configf > > > index 0ebc481..d8a4cc5 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_configfs.c > > > +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_configfs.c > > > @@ -1553,6 +1553,7 @@ static void lio_release_cmd(struct se_cmd > *se_cmd) > > > .module = THIS_MODULE, > > > .name = "iscsi", > > > .node_acl_size = sizeof(struct iscsi_node_acl), > > > + .max_data_sg_nents = 32, /* 32 * PAGE_SIZE = MAXIMUM > TRANSFER LENGTH */ > > > .get_fabric_name = iscsi_get_fabric_name, > > > .tpg_get_wwn = lio_tpg_get_endpoint_wwn, > > > .tpg_get_tag = lio_tpg_get_tag, > > > > > With above change, SQ overflow isn't observed. I started of with > max_data_sg_nents = 16. > > OK, so max_data_sg_nents=32 (MAXIMUM TRANSFER SIZE=128K with 4k pages) > avoids SQ overflow with iw_cxgb4. > > What is iw_cxgb4 reporting to isert_create_cq():attr.cap.max_send_sge..? The ib_device attributes only advertise max_sge, which applies to both send and recv queues. Because the iw_cxgb4 RQ max sge is 4, iw_cxgb4 currently advertises 4 for max_sge, even though the SQ can handle more. So attr.cap.max_send_sge ends up being 4. I have a todo on my list to extend the rdma/core to have max_send_sge and max_recv_sge attributes. If it helps, I can bump up the priority of this. Perhaps Bharat could do the work. Steve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
