On 9/4/2016 6:36 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>>> What I think it missing is a release schedule, stable fixes
>>> methodology and merge cycles. I think once we can agree on that
>>> a lot of the concerns will be addressed.
>>
>> This is exactly my point.
>> What do you think if we follow kernel release cycles and schedules? It
>> will give to everyone in RDMA world clear answer on WHEN question.
>
> That can work. But, I think that we need the stable fixes to be released
> more frequently (Ideally on-demand, but it might be too much of an
> overhead both to maintainers and users).
I don't think so. A regular release cadence to match the kernel, and on
demand hot fixes seems perfectly doable to me.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
