On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:39:47 +0100 Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12-01-08 12:12, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > I'm a bit confused here. Bjorn Helgaas wanted to remove the pnp_start/stop_dev() calls completely, and you want them called all the time. :) > > Wanted where? Haven't seen a coment from Bjorn? But -- while removing them > both looks (as) sensible from a mirror-image viewpoint, this wouldn't fix > the problem. > Ah, sorry. It was a different thread. Look for a mail with the subject "PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path" in the LKML och linux-pm archives. > > But we certainly need the pnp_start_dev() in the current flow of things. It > not being called is the problem this fixes... > I think the previous suggestion was that the drivers should call this, not the core, so that it behaved more like other parts of the kernel (e.g. PCI). Rgds Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
