On Saturday 12 January 2008 16:21:50 Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:39:47 +0100 > > Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12-01-08 12:12, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > I'm a bit confused here. Bjorn Helgaas wanted to remove the > > > pnp_start/stop_dev() calls completely, and you want them called all the > > > time. :) > > > > Wanted where? Haven't seen a coment from Bjorn? But -- while removing > > them both looks (as) sensible from a mirror-image viewpoint, this > > wouldn't fix the problem. > > Ah, sorry. It was a different thread. Look for a mail with the subject > "PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path" in the LKML och > linux-pm archives. > > > But we certainly need the pnp_start_dev() in the current flow of things. > > It not being called is the problem this fixes... > > I think the previous suggestion was that the drivers should call this, not > the core, so that it behaved more like other parts of the kernel (e.g. > PCI). I don't think that drivers should call pnp_start_dev() on resume. All drivers would need to call it as all PnP cards are disabled after boot. No driver does that currently. 3c509 driver doesn't seem to register as pnp_card_driver so that's probably why it's not enable after resume. I guess that more ISA PnP drivers have this problem. I have some other PnP network and sound cards so I'll test them. -- Ondrej Zary _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
