On 11-01-08 19:40, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Friday 11 January 2008 15:21:55 Rene Herman wrote:
Hrmpf. Well, okay. Ondrej -- I assume this patch fixes things?
Yes, it works fine. 3c509 card still does not work after resume, but that
looks like another problem.
Okay. Would now only still like to know why the test in resume() means
trouble for you while it seems the same test in suspend() should've
triggered as well and not have stopped the device in the first place.
Know absolutely nothing about hibernation so added the listed maintainers to
the CC.
Pavel, Rafael -- the attached fixes snd-cs4236 not coming back to life for
Ondrej after hibernation due to the PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE test
triggering in pnp_bus_resume() and keeping the card in a suspended state.
There's issues on wether or not the flag _should_ be set (that is, be part
of PNP_DRIVER_RES_DISABLE) and that it shouldn't be tested by these code
patchs in the first place, but is it in fact expected that this would be
neccessary?
That is, is it expected/designed that the same test in pnp_bus_suspend()
didn't cause the device to not be disabled in the first place?
Rene.
commit 7d16e8b3e7739599d32c8006f9e84fadb86b8296
Author: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat Jan 12 00:00:35 2008 +0100
PNP: do not test PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE on suspend/resume
The PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE flag is meant to signify that
the PNP core should not change resources for the device -- not
that it shouldn't disable/enable the device on suspend/resume.
ALSA ISAPnP drivers set PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANAGE (0x0001)
through setting PNP_DRIVER_RES_DISABLE (0x0003). The latter
including the former may in itself be considered rather
unexpected but doesn't change that suspend/resume wouldn't seem
to have any business testing the flag.
As reported by Ondrej Zary for snd-cs4236, ALSA driven ISAPnP
cards don't survive swsusp hibernation with the resume skipping
setting the resources due to testing the flag -- the same test
in the suspend path isn't enough to keep hibernation from
disabling the card it seems.
These tests were added (in 2005) by Piere Ossman in commit
68094e3251a664ee1389fcf179497237cbf78331, "alsa: Improved PnP
suspend support" who doesn't remember why. This deletes them.
Signed-off-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/driver.c b/drivers/pnp/driver.c
index a262762..12a1645 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/driver.c
@@ -161,8 +161,7 @@ static int pnp_bus_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
return error;
}
- if (!(pnp_drv->flags & PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE) &&
- pnp_can_disable(pnp_dev)) {
+ if (pnp_can_disable(pnp_dev)) {
error = pnp_stop_dev(pnp_dev);
if (error)
return error;
@@ -185,14 +184,17 @@ static int pnp_bus_resume(struct device *dev)
if (pnp_dev->protocol && pnp_dev->protocol->resume)
pnp_dev->protocol->resume(pnp_dev);
- if (!(pnp_drv->flags & PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE)) {
+ if (pnp_can_write(pnp_dev)) {
error = pnp_start_dev(pnp_dev);
if (error)
return error;
}
- if (pnp_drv->resume)
- return pnp_drv->resume(pnp_dev);
+ if (pnp_drv->resume) {
+ error = pnp_drv->resume(pnp_dev);
+ if (error)
+ return error;
+ }
return 0;
}
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
