Martin Steigerwald schrieb:
Hi,Am Mittwoch 02 Januar 2008 schrieb Nigel Cunningham: Yep, for me, too.This has been refreshingly different on tuxonice mailing lists. I am also a bit reluctant about the traffic. I already have some quite high traffic mailinglists with 30000-40000 mails a year, but LKML would top these easily I guess and I am not that sure I want to put that load on my mail infrastructure to follow TuxOnIce developments. I think this is a generic problem for testers of specific kernel subsystems... LKML's traffic is way too high, but I understand, that Nigel wants to push TuxOnIce a little bit closer to the main kernel. So I would actually be happy if it goes on LKML and there is some way to filter the TOI mails out. Like for example you drop mails, that don't have [TuxOnIce] in their subject (or similar). I could live with that. Actually the people on the LKML should use those more often, some do use tags like that already, but a lot of people don't and that makes it look like just a huge amount of email without any structure in it. Yep, 3.0-rc3 is definitely the most reliable toi/suspend2 version I've ever had.But then LKML is were TuxOnIce is visible to the kernel developer community. I would appreciate linux-pm I think maybe with a guideline to CC to LKML in usual cases... BTW: toi-3.0-rc3 is rocking along nicely on my two ThinkPads (T42 and T23)... I am using 2.6.23.12 with cfs-v24.1... I've done around 30-50 hibernate/resume cycles without any problems. I only stopped, because my touchpad stops working after resume with the Elantech driver, but I normally don't use it a lot, so I can live with that. Greets |
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
