Hi Martin. Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Mittwoch 02 Januar 2008 schrieb Nigel Cunningham: >> Hi. > > Hi, > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham >>>> wrote: >>>>>> I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, >>>>>> ACPI, etc. to go to one of the kernel-related lists, but I >>>>>> think linux-pm may be better for that due to the much lower >>>>>> traffic. >>>>> I guess that makes sense. I guess people can always be >>>>> referred to LKML for the issues where the appropriate person >>>>> isn't on linux-pm. >>>> Hi Nigel, >>>> >>>> I'd really recommend pushing the TuxOnIce discussions to LKML. >>> CCing linux-pm (or even linux-acpi) on problem reports would >>> still be recommended, though. :-) >> Right. And that may make things easier as far as TuxOnIce users go >> too. I have one user who currently subscribes to suspend2-users who >> already tried subscribing to LKML and said he didn't like the >> experience. Using linux-pm instead would save some pain there. > > I am a bit reluctant about LKML from some of the discussions I have > seen there and participated in during CFS / CK discussion. I really > didn't like the tone. Its one thing to say ones own oppinion, another > one to bash at each other as if there was no tomorrow. > > This has been refreshingly different on tuxonice mailing lists. I am > also a bit reluctant about the traffic. I already have some quite > high traffic mailinglists with 30000-40000 mails a year, but LKML > would top these easily I guess and I am not that sure I want to put > that load on my mail infrastructure to follow TuxOnIce developments. > I think this is a generic problem for testers of specific kernel > subsystems... > > But then LKML is were TuxOnIce is visible to the kernel developer > community. > > I would appreciate linux-pm I think maybe with a guideline to CC to > LKML in usual cases... Thanks for your feedback. I think that's the way to go. > BTW: toi-3.0-rc3 is rocking along nicely on my two ThinkPads (T42 and > T23)... I am using 2.6.23.12 with cfs-v24.1... Great to hear! Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
