Hi. Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >>>> I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go to >>>> one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be better for that >>>> due to the much lower traffic. >>> I guess that makes sense. I guess people can always be referred to LKML >>> for the issues where the appropriate person isn't on linux-pm. >> Hi Nigel, >> >> I'd really recommend pushing the TuxOnIce discussions to LKML. > > CCing linux-pm (or even linux-acpi) on problem reports would still be > recommended, though. :-) Right. And that may make things easier as far as TuxOnIce users go too. I have one user who currently subscribes to suspend2-users who already tried subscribing to LKML and said he didn't like the experience. Using linux-pm instead would save some pain there. Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
