Re: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: do not use pm_ops (was: Re: suspend2 merge (was: Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 11:16 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Well... the powerdown during hibernation... does not have _anything_
> to do with snapshot/restore. It is really a very deep sleep; similar
> to soft powerdown, but not quite.

It's also horribly confusing to intermingle hibernation and suspend into
one operation struct when there's only a single user for it anyway. Just
look at what all the arm platforms had there, trying to veto suspend to
disk through pm_ops etc. I don't technically disagree with you, but from
a point of how to understand this whole thing I'd rather have hibernate
and suspend be totally orthogonal.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux