Hi! > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Can you please apply the appended patch and see if that helps? > > > > A second attempt also succeeded, so I think it's an improvement at least. > > OK, so please run with it applied for a while to make sure it helps. > > Ugh, we seem to have a problem with the code ordering in which > platform_finish() goes before device_resume(), at least in the hibernation > (aka s2disk) case. Was not platform_finish before device_resume requirement for MSI interrupts working? > This is the second report confirming that the change of this ordering has fixed > the a suspend problem, but the change of this ordering is intrusive, so I was > afraid to do it before 2.6.21. Can we try to change it now? I guess so. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
