On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 16:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Ugh, we seem to have a problem with the code ordering in which > platform_finish() goes before device_resume(), at least in the hibernation > (aka s2disk) case. > > This is the second report confirming that the change of this ordering has fixed > the a suspend problem, but the change of this ordering is intrusive, so I was > afraid to do it before 2.6.21. Can we try to change it now? I don't care about that ordering at all; ACPI is the only user of hibernation_ops (which are still part of pm_ops now.) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
