Re: [PATCH] swsusp: do not use pm_ops (was: Re: suspend2 merge (was: Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 16:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > That comment doesn't seem right. This is in ->enter so afaict the image
> > hasn't been loaded yet at this point. I don't know if you just moved
> > code but if you did then I don't think it was correct before.
> 
> It was in your patch, so I kept it, but I don't think it's correct too.

If it was in my patch then it must be there in the original code, iirc I
just shuffled it a bit :)

> Moreover, it seems that acpi_save_state_mem() and acpi_restore_state_mem() are
> only needed by s2ram, so we can safely remove them from the hibernation code
> path.  Pavel, is that correct?

This I don't know. They seemed to be done on hibernate too.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux