Hi! > > Why not give this added flexibility ? Archs who don't care don't need to > > bother and it will make us happy... it's not like we are about to -add- > > burden to other architectures. > > Actually, I personally two hands up for adding the flexibility, > but you should define what is supposed to do on this level and > what is don't, or not desirable. > > For example, I'd like to enter back to suspend mode > right from "activate" stage, because I've woken up just > to update some data and I do not want to resume all devices > for that, is it ok for "activate"? No, I do not think we can do that w/o major surgery. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
