Hi! > > I doubt your reasoning is cogent enough. If you add such a global thing, > > you should prove it, or clearly explain what is the thing for. > > I don't believe that it's not possible to solve that decrementer case > > without this change. Can't you add appropriate platform_device which > > would register early enough, to meet that timing requirement when it > > gets suspended? > > That's would be absolutely disgusting... (relying on magic ordering of > platform devices). Adding platform hook to disable interrupts just because we need one platform device last is not nice, either. (And does decrementer even need to come last?) Anyway, platform devices may need specific ordering on more than power pc, so perhaps we should just make ordering more stable so that relying on it is no longer a hack? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
