Re: [PATCH v2] pm_ops: add system quiesce/activate hooks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I doubt your reasoning is cogent enough. If you add such a global thing,
> you should prove it, or clearly explain what is the thing for.
> I don't believe that it's not possible to solve that decrementer case
> without this change. Can't you add appropriate platform_device which
> would register early enough, to meet that timing requirement when it
> gets suspended?

That's would be absolutely disgusting... (relying on magic ordering of
platform devices).

The fact is, the architecture needs to do various things around the
IRQ disabling and enabling, and thus we should have a hook for it.
I fail to understand why there is so much resistance here...

Ben.


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux