On Thursday, 12 April 2007 12:16, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > I doubt your reasoning is cogent enough. If you add such a global thing, > > > you should prove it, or clearly explain what is the thing for. > > > I don't believe that it's not possible to solve that decrementer case > > > without this change. Can't you add appropriate platform_device which > > > would register early enough, to meet that timing requirement when it > > > gets suspended? > > > > That's would be absolutely disgusting... (relying on magic ordering of > > platform devices). > > Adding platform hook to disable interrupts just because we need one > platform device last is not nice, either. (And does decrementer even > need to come last?) > > Anyway, platform devices may need specific ordering on more than power > pc, so perhaps we should just make ordering more stable so that > relying on it is no longer a hack? I second that, although I think it also would be a global change. Greetings, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
