Hi! > > Adding platform hook to disable interrupts just because we need one > > platform device last is not nice, either. (And does decrementer even > > need to come last?) > > But the hack is classifying the decrementer as a platform device in the > first place. And then we'd still need to have one platform device and > one sysdev since we want to wake up the decrementer before enabling > IRQs Can decrementer be waked a little later? > but set it to a high value before disabling IRQs. Or we'd need some sort > of special foo device that has hooks both before and after and comes > last/first, just for one user? Have two devices, then. > Besides, we can always rewrite it later when somebody introduces a foo > device that fits above model. Since this patch essentially changes > nothing, I'd been hoping to get it into .22 so we can finally start No. Hacks like this are impossible to get rid of. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
