On Mon 2006-09-11 14:53:03, Mark Gross wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Lets get kernel<->user interface right, first. You'll need to create > > Documentation/ entries for your interfaces, eventually, so lets do > > that, first, and then talk about code. Oh and it would be nice to cc > > lkml on that document, too. New kernel<->user interface is not > > decision taken lightly. > > Is this just trying delay power op getting into the kernel? We are > building up / evolving a PM stack from bottom up and you want to the > high level interface to be well defined and agreed upon first? As long as you do not introduce _any_ user<->kernel interfaces within patch series, going without Documentation is okay. But IIRC that was not the case. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
