Hi! On Mon 2006-09-11 11:57:28, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > [snip] > >> Are you arguing that the cpufreq interface be morphed to support power > >> op applications? > > > > No. I'm arguing that > > > > * cpufreq interface should be used for changing cpu frequency > the patch set i sent out has cpufreq used for changing cpu frequency, > hasn't it? I was talking about kernel<->user interface. You did echo low > something to change CPU frequency, IIRC. > can we eventually start talking more close to the code rather than > speculating without it? Lets get kernel<->user interface right, first. You'll need to create Documentation/ entries for your interfaces, eventually, so lets do that, first, and then talk about code. Oh and it would be nice to cc lkml on that document, too. New kernel<->user interface is not decision taken lightly. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
