On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 18:29 -0700, ext David Singleton wrote: > > > > - latency is not an attribute of a certain operating point but a > function of > > two arguments - current operating point and a point we are goint to > > switch to. Therefor latency just does not belong to 'struct powerop' > > I disagree. Problem is that you disagree without giving your reasons. Here is another reason putting latency into your operating point definition isn't going to fly: http://lwn.net/Articles/196900/ <--- An API for specifying latency constraints http://lwn.net/Articles/197282/ Please comment on PowerOP patches; dissect them if need be on why you don't agree with the approach. Regards, Amit -- Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria at nokia.com> Nokia
