[linux-pm] Nested suspends; messages vs. states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > > > 	pm_message_t		power_state;
> > > > > 
> > > > > Obviously a message isn't the same thing as a state.  This looks like 
> > > > > something that will need to be changed in a lot of drivers when we 
> > > > > introduce the new notion of a power state.
> > > > 
> > > > This is not so obvious to me. 
> 
> It's a semantics thing, among others.  "System transitioning to
> state Z" is a message, as is "system leaving state Z".  Both are
> distinct from the "system state Z" being described.

But that does not mean you can't use same type for both.

								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux