On Po 21-03-05 16:14:09, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > Messages vs. states: At the moment the PM core seems to be pretty > > > confused over this distinction. Right in the definition of struct > > > dev_pm_info we have: > > > > > > pm_message_t power_state; > > > > > > Obviously a message isn't the same thing as a state. This looks like > > > something that will need to be changed in a lot of drivers when we > > > introduce the new notion of a power state. > > > > This is not so obvious to me. Message seems to represent the state > > driver is in quite well... Plus we need PMSG_ON for state the device > > gets after resume, but that's quite easy... > > So what value for power_state do you use to tell apart PCI D1 from D2? You just ask via pci_choose_state(), and it tells you... pci_choose_state() should be deterministic. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
