On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Messages vs. states: At the moment the PM core seems to be pretty > > confused over this distinction. Right in the definition of struct > > dev_pm_info we have: > > > > pm_message_t power_state; > > > > Obviously a message isn't the same thing as a state. This looks like > > something that will need to be changed in a lot of drivers when we > > introduce the new notion of a power state. > > This is not so obvious to me. Message seems to represent the state > driver is in quite well... Plus we need PMSG_ON for state the device > gets after resume, but that's quite easy... So what value for power_state do you use to tell apart PCI D1 from D2? Alan Stern
