Hi! > Messages vs. states: At the moment the PM core seems to be pretty > confused over this distinction. Right in the definition of struct > dev_pm_info we have: > > pm_message_t power_state; > > Obviously a message isn't the same thing as a state. This looks like > something that will need to be changed in a lot of drivers when we > introduce the new notion of a power state. This is not so obvious to me. Message seems to represent the state driver is in quite well... Plus we need PMSG_ON for state the device gets after resume, but that's quite easy... Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
