On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:08 -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:54:55 +1100 > "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On that note, no matter where we have it, I'd like to limit it to > > > 6-8 people, with at most maybe 10. I don't wish to exclude anyone, > > > but I think that smaller groups can remain more focused. Plus, > > > there's all those sociological studies that say 6-7 people is the > > > optimal size for a discussion group. :) > > > > Us, Nigel, David Brownell, Alan, Pavel, Brown, we are already 7... ? > > Are there any logical divisions of area of interest that could result in > multiple productive meetings? Not sure. There are 2 different "main" areas, which are the global system suspend/resume, and the "local" or "dynamic" power management of devices & busses. We have a good solution for the first, but not for the second at this point, so I would expect that we concentrate on that part. Plus some always-pending issues for global suspend, the biggest one beeing video chips that need a re-POST on wakeup. Ben.
