On ?t 10-03-05 22:31:37, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > > > kobject_uevent in kernel does not mean we have to abuse it for suspend notifycation. > > (How would that notifycation work, btw? If done asynchronously, system will be suspended > > before processes will have chance to do anything). > > in my experience, this is exactly what happens. I am still fighting > screenlockers that only kick in after the resume has long since > finished ;-) :-) Ok, so how do you want your screensavers notified? You can certainly add killall -9 Xscreensaver at the end of suspend script :-)))))))))))))))))))) Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
