swsusp & modules [was Re: [linux-pm] [Fwd: Re: PM messages]]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > > No. Two transitions were okay up-to now, and I see no reason why to introduce 3rd.
> > > > And btw, during suspend-to-disk it is "freeze, unfreeze, suspend".
> > > >
> > > > > 	- Stop
> > > > > 	- Start
> > > >
> > > > Would be confusing to network drivers (they use stop/start already for something else).
> > > > And besides it is very bad idea to try to change naming once again.
> > >
> > > I wasn't proposing a hard name change; only trying to get the terminology
> > > straight and consistent from a conceptual level. unfreeze isn't even a
> > > real word. :)
> >
> > Well, freeze/unfreeze worked well on IRC, and its also used in that
> > "pm summary"... Maybe it is not an english work, but people seem to
> > understand it.
> 
> 'thaw' is the english opposite of 'freeze'. Note, though, that that
> terminology is currently used for processes during suspend.

During IRC talk we were talking about device_suspend(FREEZE)
call. From that point on "freezing drivers" means same thing as your
"stop", and people seem to understand it.
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux