swsusp & modules [was Re: [linux-pm] [Fwd: Re: PM messages]]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > > No. Two transitions were okay up-to now, and I see no reason why to introduce 3rd.
> > > And btw, during suspend-to-disk it is "freeze, unfreeze, suspend".
> > >
> > > > 	- Stop
> > > > 	- Start
> > >
> > > Would be confusing to network drivers (they use stop/start already for something else).
> > > And besides it is very bad idea to try to change naming once again.
> >
> > I wasn't proposing a hard name change; only trying to get the terminology
> > straight and consistent from a conceptual level. unfreeze isn't even a
> > real word. :)
>
> Well, freeze/unfreeze worked well on IRC, and its also used in that
> "pm summary"... Maybe it is not an english work, but people seem to
> understand it.

'thaw' is the english opposite of 'freeze'. Note, though, that that
terminology is currently used for processes during suspend.


	Pat


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux