On 11/11/2016 09:24 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 11/10/2016 6:18 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> On 11/09/2016 03:05 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We've been working through the details of getting ACPI to work on >>> arm64, and there have been lots of questions about what this means for >>> PCI. I've outlined this for several people individually, but I'm >>> going to send this separately, apart from a specific patch series, to >>> make sure we're all on the same page. Please correct my errors and >>> misunderstandings. >>> >>> Bjorn >>> >>> [snip....] >> >> A big +1 to all of this. This also looks like something that should >> be added to either PCI, ACPI or arm64 documentation (or even all three). >> What do you think? > > > I agree. In order to have compliant systems, we have to make PNP0C02 required > in the PCIe appendix of the SBSA specification. We're ramping up for a "Constitutional Convention" on the SBBR between a few of the vendors and we'll make sure this is covered. Jon. -- Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
