Re: ACPI namespace details for ARM64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:05:06PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

[...]

> ACPI defined a Producer/Consumer bit that was intended to distinguish
> the bridge apertures from the bridge registers [4, 5]. However, BIOSes
> didn't use that bit correctly, and the result is that OSes have to
> assume that everything in a PCI host bridge _CRS is a window. That
> leaves no way to describe the bridge registers in the PNP0A03/PNP0A08
> device itself.

ACPI 6.1 states that in the revision changes 4.0a Apr.2010 (xiii)
"Consumer/Producer bit is ignored (Restored 2.0C change that had
been lost)" and still that bit is marked as valid. If it is not
reliable it should be set as "ignored" in the specs (as it was
on ACPI 2.0C, BTW), as it is it is just a source of confusion.

Thanks again !
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux