Hi all,
We've been working through the details of getting ACPI to work on
arm64, and there have been lots of questions about what this means for
PCI. I've outlined this for several people individually, but I'm
going to send this separately, apart from a specific patch series, to
make sure we're all on the same page. Please correct my errors and
misunderstandings.
Bjorn
The basic requirement is that the ACPI namespace should describe
*everything* that consumes address space unless there's another
standard way for the OS to find it [1, 2]. For example, windows that
are forwarded to PCI by a PCI host bridge should be described via ACPI
devices, since the OS can't locate the host bridge by itself. PCI
devices *below* the host bridge do not need to be described via ACPI,
because the resources they consume are inside the host bridge windows,
and the OS can discover them via the standard PCI enumeration
mechanism (using config accesses to read and size the BARs).
This ACPI resource description is done via _CRS methods of devices in
the ACPI namespace [2]. _CRS methods are like generalized PCI BARs:
the OS can read _CRS and figure out what resource is being consumed
even if it doesn't have a driver for the device [3]. That's important
because it means an old OS can work correctly even on a system with
new devices unknown to the OS. The new devices won't do anything, but
the OS can at least make sure no resources conflict with them.
Static tables like MCFG, HPET, ECDT, etc., are *not* mechanisms for
reserving address space! The static tables are for things the OS
needs to know early in boot, before it can parse the ACPI namespace.
If a new table is defined, an old OS needs to operate correctly even
though it ignores the table. _CRS allows that because it is generic
and understood by the old OS; a static table does not.
If the OS is expected to manage an ACPI device, that device will have
a specific _HID/_CID that tells the OS what driver to bind to it, and
the _CRS tells the OS and the driver where the device's registers are.
PNP0C02 "motherboard" devices are basically a catch-all. There's no
programming model for them other than "don't use these resources for
anything else." So any address space that is (1) not claimed by some
other ACPI device and (2) should not be assigned by the OS to
something else, should be claimed by a PNP0C02 _CRS method.
PCI host bridges are PNP0A03 or PNP0A08 devices. Their _CRS should
describe all the address space they consume. In principle, this would
be all the windows they forward down to the PCI bus, as well as the
bridge registers themselves. The bridge registers include things like
secondary/subordinate bus registers that determine the bus range below
the bridge, window registers that describe the apertures, etc. These
are all device-specific, non-architected things, so the only way a
PNP0A03/PNP0A08 driver can manage them is via _PRS/_CRS/_SRS, which
contain the device-specific details. These bridge registers also
include ECAM space, since it is consumed by the bridge.
ACPI defined a Producer/Consumer bit that was intended to distinguish
the bridge apertures from the bridge registers [4, 5]. However,
BIOSes didn't use that bit correctly, and the result is that OSes have
to assume that everything in a PCI host bridge _CRS is a window. That
leaves no way to describe the bridge registers in the PNP0A03/PNP0A08
device itself.
The workaround is to describe the bridge registers (including ECAM
space) in PNP0C02 catch-all devices [6]. With the exception of ECAM,
the bridge register space is device-specific anyway, so the generic
PNP0A03/PNP0A08 driver (pci_root.c) has no need to know about it. For
ECAM, pci_root.c learns about the space from either MCFG or the _CBA
method.
Note that the PCIe spec actually does require ECAM unless there's a
standard firmware interface for config access, e.g., the ia64 SAL
interface [7]. One reason is that we want a generic host bridge
driver (pci_root.c), and a generic driver requires a generic way to
access config space.
[1] ACPI 6.0, sec 6.1:
For any device that is on a non-enumerable type of bus (for
example, an ISA bus), OSPM enumerates the devices' identifier(s)
and the ACPI system firmware must supply an _HID object ... for
each device to enable OSPM to do that.
[2] ACPI 6.0, sec 3.7:
The OS enumerates motherboard devices simply by reading through
the ACPI Namespace looking for devices with hardware IDs.
Each device enumerated by ACPI includes ACPI-defined objects in
the ACPI Namespace that report the hardware resources the device
could occupy [_PRS], an object that reports the resources that are
currently used by the device [_CRS], and objects for configuring
those resources [_SRS]. The information is used by the Plug and
Play OS (OSPM) to configure the devices.
[3] ACPI 6.0, sec 6.2:
OSPM uses device configuration objects to configure hardware
resources for devices enumerated via ACPI. Device configuration
objects provide information about current and possible resource
requirements, the relationship between shared resources, and
methods for configuring hardware resources.
When OSPM enumerates a device, it calls _PRS to determine the
resource requirements of the device. It may also call _CRS to
find the current resource settings for the device. Using this
information, the Plug and Play system determines what resources
the device should consume and sets those resources by calling the
device’s _SRS control method.
In ACPI, devices can consume resources (for example, legacy
keyboards), provide resources (for example, a proprietary PCI
bridge), or do both. Unless otherwise specified, resources for a
device are assumed to be taken from the nearest matching resource
above the device in the device hierarchy.
[4] ACPI 6.0, sec 6.4.3.5.4:
Extended Address Space Descriptor
General Flags: Bit [0] Consumer/Producer:
1–This device consumes this resource
0–This device produces and consumes this resource
[5] ACPI 6.0, sec 19.6.43:
ResourceUsage specifies whether the Memory range is consumed by
this device (ResourceConsumer) or passed on to child devices
(ResourceProducer). If nothing is specified, then
ResourceConsumer is assumed.
[6] PCI Firmware 3.0, sec 4.1.2:
If the operating system does not natively comprehend reserving the
MMCFG region, the MMCFG region must be reserved by firmware. The
address range reported in the MCFG table or by _CBA method (see
Section 4.1.3) must be reserved by declaring a motherboard
resource. For most systems, the motherboard resource would appear
at the root of the ACPI namespace (under \_SB) in a node with a
_HID of EISAID (PNP0C02), and the resources in this case should
not be claimed in the root PCI bus’s _CRS. The resources can
optionally be returned in Int15 E820 or EFIGetMemoryMap as
reserved memory but must always be reported through ACPI as a
motherboard resource.
[7] PCI Express 3.0, sec 7.2.2:
For systems that are PC-compatible, or that do not implement a
processor-architecture-specific firmware interface standard that
allows access to the Configuration Space, the ECAM is required as
defined in this section.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
