On 11/10/2016 6:18 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 11/09/2016 03:05 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We've been working through the details of getting ACPI to work on >> arm64, and there have been lots of questions about what this means for >> PCI. I've outlined this for several people individually, but I'm >> going to send this separately, apart from a specific patch series, to >> make sure we're all on the same page. Please correct my errors and >> misunderstandings. >> >> Bjorn >> >> [snip....] > > A big +1 to all of this. This also looks like something that should > be added to either PCI, ACPI or arm64 documentation (or even all three). > What do you think? I agree. In order to have compliant systems, we have to make PNP0C02 required in the PCIe appendix of the SBSA specification. > > Thank you for putting this together, Bjorn. > > -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
