On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Hong-Xing.Zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <Hong-Xing.Zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This hunk is wrong. There is no "power-on-gpio" in the binding anymore. > Also there is already a change in Shawns tree to model this as a always-on regulator. If we really want to control pci bus power this needs to be done through this regulator, not some arbitrary gpio hack. Yes, I never asked you to include 'power-on-gpio'. What needs to be done is the same as in imx6qdl-sabresd, which passes the regulator that powers the PCI slot. You can refer to Shawn's tree or linux-next. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
