On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I don't understand this one at all. It looks like you mashed together >> at least two changes: (1) prefer I/O space above 64K if available, and >> (2) mark secondary bus resources with IORESOURCE_IO_32 when the P2P >> bridge I/O window address decode type is PCI_IO_RANGE_TYPE_32 and use >> that to limit allocations. > > let drop the one about IORESOURCE_IO_32. > > that should only fix one reallocation bug in theory out of x86. If there's a bug, we should try to fix it. I just don't understand what the bug *is*. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
